[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:09:24 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: iproc-gpio: Silence probe deferral messages
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 02:30:21PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> We can have gpiochip_add_data() return -EPROBE_DEFER which will make us
> produce the "unable to add GPIO chip" message which is confusing. Use
> dev_err_probe() to silence probe deferral messages.
...
> ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, chip);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to add GPIO chip\n");
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "unable to add GPIO chip\n");
> return ret;
return dev_err_probe(...);
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists