linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: add qca8386/qca8084 clock and reset definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:57:19 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: add qca8386/qca8084 clock and
 reset definitions

On 08/08/2023 07:19, Jie Luo wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: qcom,nsscc-qca8k
>>
>> SoC name is before IP block names. See:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
>>
>> qca8k is not SoC specific. I don't know what you are documenting here,
>> but if this is a SoC, then follow SoC rules.
>>
>> If this is not SoC, it confuses me a bit to use GCC binding.
>>
>> Anyway, this was not tested, as pointed out by bot... Please test the
>> code before sending.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks for the review comments.
> qca8383/qca8084 is a network chip that support switch mode and PHY mode,
> the hardware register is accessed by MDIO bus, which is not a SOC.
> 
> But it has the self-contained clock controller system, the clock 
> framework of qca8386/qca8084 is same as the GCC of ipq platform such as 
> ipq9574.

OK

> 
> would you help advise whether we can document it with the compatible
> "qcom,qca8k-nsscc"?

For example:
qcom,qca8084-nsscc

Best regards,
Krzysztof