[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 11:01:19 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages.
On 29.03.23 03:17, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>
> To split a THP to any lower order pages, we need to reform THPs on
> subpages at given order and add page refcount based on the new page
> order. Also we need to reinitialize page_deferred_list after removing
> the page from the split_queue, otherwise a subsequent split will see
> list corruption when checking the page_deferred_list again.
>
> It has many uses, like minimizing the number of pages after
> truncating a huge pagecache page. For anonymous THPs, we can only split
> them to order-0 like before until we add support for any size anonymous
> THPs.
>
Because I'm currently looking into something that would also not be
compatible with order-1 for now:
You should make it clear that order-1 is not supported, like:
"mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages (except order 1)"
And clarify in the subject why that is the case.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists