linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] PCI/AER: Disable AER interrupt on suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230809185232.GA402997@bhelgaas>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:52:32 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, koba.ko@...onical.com,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] PCI/AER: Disable AER interrupt on suspend

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:58:24AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 7:17 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:00:13AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > > PCIe services that share an IRQ with PME, such as AER or DPC,
> > > may cause a spurious wakeup on system suspend. To prevent this,
> > > disable the AER interrupt notification during the system suspend
> > > process.
> >
> > I see that in this particular BZ dmesg log, PME, AER, and DPC do share
> > the same IRQ, but I don't think this is true in general.
> >
> > Root Ports usually use MSI or MSI-X.  PME and hotplug events use the
> > Interrupt Message Number in the PCIe Capability, but AER uses the one
> > in the AER Root Error Status register, and DPC uses the one in the DPC
> > Capability register.  Those potentially correspond to three distinct
> > MSI/MSI-X vectors.
> >
> > I think this probably has nothing to do with the IRQ being *shared*,
> > but just that putting the downstream component into D3cold, where the
> > link state is L3, may cause the upstream component to log and signal a
> > link-related error as the link goes completely down.
> 
> That's quite likely a better explanation than my wording.
> Assuming AER IRQ and PME IRQ are not shared, does system get woken up
> by AER IRQ?

Rafael could answer this better than I can, but
Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst says device interrupts
are generally disabled during suspend after the "late" phase of
suspending devices, i.e.,

  dpm_suspend_noirq
    suspend_device_irqs           <-- disable non-wakeup IRQs
    dpm_noirq_suspend_devices
      ...
        pci_pm_suspend_noirq      # (I assume)
	  pci_prepare_to_sleep

I think the downstream component would be put in D3cold by
pci_prepare_to_sleep(), so non-wakeup interrupts should be disabled by
then.

I assume PME would generally *not* be disabled since it's needed for
wakeup, so I think any interrupt that shares the PME IRQ and occurs
during suspend may cause a spurious wakeup.

If so, it's exactly as you said at the beginning: AER/DPC/etc sharing
the PME IRQ may cause spurious wakeups, and we would have to disable
those other interrupts at the source, e.g., by clearing
PCI_ERR_ROOT_CMD_FATAL_EN etc (exactly as your series does).

> > I don't think D0-D3hot should be relevant here because in all those
> > states, the link should be active because the downstream config space
> > remains accessible.  So I'm not sure if it's possible, but I wonder if
> > there's a more targeted place we could do this, e.g., in the path that
> > puts downstream devices in D3cold.
> 
> Let me try to work on this.
> 
> Kai-Heng
> 
> >
> > > As Per PCIe Base Spec 5.0, section 5.2, titled "Link State Power Management",
> > > TLP and DLLP transmission are disabled for a Link in L2/L3 Ready (D3hot), L2
> > > (D3cold with aux power) and L3 (D3cold) states. So disabling the AER
> > > notification during suspend and re-enabling them during the resume process
> > > should not affect the basic functionality.
> > >
> > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216295
> > > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> > > ---
> > > v6:
> > > v5:
> > >  - Wording.
> > >
> > > v4:
> > > v3:
> > >  - No change.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > >  - Only disable AER IRQ.
> > >  - No more check on PME IRQ#.
> > >  - Use helper.
> > >
> > >  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > > index 1420e1f27105..9c07fdbeb52d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > > @@ -1356,6 +1356,26 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int aer_suspend(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
> > > +     struct pci_dev *pdev = rpc->rpd;
> > > +
> > > +     aer_disable_irq(pdev);
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int aer_resume(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
> > > +     struct pci_dev *pdev = rpc->rpd;
> > > +
> > > +     aer_enable_irq(pdev);
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * aer_root_reset - reset Root Port hierarchy, RCEC, or RCiEP
> > >   * @dev: pointer to Root Port, RCEC, or RCiEP
> > > @@ -1420,6 +1440,8 @@ static struct pcie_port_service_driver aerdriver = {
> > >       .service        = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER,
> > >
> > >       .probe          = aer_probe,
> > > +     .suspend        = aer_suspend,
> > > +     .resume         = aer_resume,
> > >       .remove         = aer_remove,
> > >  };
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >