linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Convert ti-cpufreq to json schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230809043012.gcsnn5bfr7j25ow7@dhruva>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:00:12 +0530
From:   Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Convert ti-cpufreq to json
 schema

On Aug 08, 2023 at 21:30:45 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Move the ti-cpufreq binding over to opp and convert the free text
> binding to json-schema.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
> ---
> Changes since V2:
> * Just fixup for commit message and picked up Reviewed-by from Dhruva.
> 
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801233341.1416552-3-nm@ti.com
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230724153911.1376830-6-nm@ti.com/
> 
> Side note: Cleanups in dt is picked up on Tony's tree:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731062551.GH5194@atomide.com/
> 
>  .../bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt           | 132 ------------------
>  .../opp/operating-points-v2-ti-cpu.yaml       |  88 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/operating-points-v2-ti-cpu.yaml
> 
[...]
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ada57bfc1da9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/operating-points-v2-ti-cpu.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/opp/operating-points-v2-ti-cpu.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: TI CPU OPP (Operating Performance Points)
> +
> +description:
> +  Certain TI SoCs, like those in the am335x, am437x, am57xx, am62x and dra7xx
> +  families support different OPPs depending on the silicon variant in use.
> +  The ti-cpufreq driver can use revision and an efuse value from the SoC to

Just learned about this yesterday, hence missed it in my earlier review.
Looks like the kernel docs [0] say that we DON'T refer to Linux or
"device driver" in bindings.

Bindings should be based on what the hardware has, not what an OS and
driver currently support.

> +  provide the OPP framework with supported hardware information. This is
> +  used to determine which OPPs from the operating-points-v2 table get enabled
> +  when it is parsed by the OPP framework.
> +
[...]

[0] https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.html

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>