[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f4f00799730ae53da67b48b0f4aea60e0d81a45.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 14:32:32 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Kernel.org Tools" <tools@...ux.kernel.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: get_maintainer, b4, and CC: stable
On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 18:21 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:50:00AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> > I suspect that either b4 or get_maintainer could see the Fixes tag and
> > then suggest to Cc stable for me.
>
> > Should get_maintainer.pl make such recommendations?
>
> People use the Fixes tag all the time for bugs that never made it into a
> release...
As Nick suggests, likely not. Many fixes do
not belong in stable and are only commits
that update the current rc.
get_maintainer checks the "fixes:" tag and
cc's the signers of the commit being fixed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists