[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230809152637.17888c9b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:26:37 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
<gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <naveenm@...vell.com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net Patch] octeontx2-pf: Allow both ntuple and TC features on
the interface
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 12:06:23 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> The current implementation does not allow the user to enable both
> hw-tc-offload and ntuple features on the interface. These checks
> are added as TC flower offload and ntuple features internally configures
> the same hardware resource MCAM. But TC HTB offload configures the
> transmit scheduler which can be safely enabled on the interface with
> ntuple feature.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by relaxing the checks and ensures
> only TC flower offload and ntuple features are mutually exclusive.
Not enabling a feature is not a bug. And it will cause conflicts
with net-next. Resend for net-next without the Fixes tag, please.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists