linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] netfilter: ipset: refactor deprecated strncpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFhGd8r4uCZHBgNG+Cws7GFZ511VEu8Q=KBiq7jU0PJHW6Z9ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:47:02 -0700
From:   Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] netfilter: ipset: refactor deprecated strncpy

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 2:58 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:19 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > Use `strscpy_pad` instead of `strncpy`.
> > >
> > > I don't think that any of these need zero-padding.
> > It's a more consistent change with the rest of the series and I don't
> > believe it has much different behavior to `strncpy` (other than
> > NUL-termination) as that will continue to pad to `n` as well.
> >
> > Do you think the `_pad` for 1/7, 6/7 and 7/7 should be changed back to
> > `strscpy` in a v3? I really am shooting in the dark as it is quite
> > hard to tell whether or not a buffer is expected to be NUL-padded or
> > not.
>
> No, you can keep it as-is.  Which tree are you targetting with this?
Not sure, I let ./getmaintainer auto-add the mailing lists. Perhaps
netdev or netfilter next trees?