linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 06/11] usb: dwc3: qcom: Refactor IRQ handling in QCOM Glue driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c8dff80-eec8-1721-8ab0-3cf12d4c1df4@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:36:48 +0530
From:   Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC:     Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        "Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/11] usb: dwc3: qcom: Refactor IRQ handling in QCOM
 Glue driver



On 8/8/2023 5:20 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8.08.2023 10:32, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>>   +
>>>> +enum dwc3_qcom_phy_irq_identifier {
>>>> +    HS_PHY_IRQ = 0,
>>>> +    DP_HS_PHY_IRQ,
>>>> +    DM_HS_PHY_IRQ,
>>>> +    SS_PHY_IRQ,
>>>>    };
>>>
>>> This enum is unused.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>>   I didn't use the enum directly, but used its members in the get_port_irq call below.
>>
>>> [..]
>>>> +static int dwc3_get_acpi_index(const struct dwc3_acpi_pdata *pdata, int irq_index)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    int acpi_index = -1;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!pdata)
>>>> +        return -1;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (irq_index == DP_HS_PHY_IRQ)
>>>> +        acpi_index = pdata->dp_hs_phy_irq_index;
>>>> +    else if (irq_index == DM_HS_PHY_IRQ)
>>>> +        acpi_index = pdata->dm_hs_phy_irq_index;
>>>> +    else if (irq_index == SS_PHY_IRQ)
>>>> +        acpi_index = pdata->ss_phy_irq_index;
>>>
>>> It looks favourable to put these in an array, instead of having to pull
>>> them out of 4 different variables conditionally.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +    return acpi_index;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int dwc3_get_port_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 port_index)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct dwc3_qcom *qcom = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +    bool is_mp_supported = (qcom->data->num_ports > 1) ? true : false;
>>>> +    const struct dwc3_acpi_pdata *pdata = qcom->acpi_pdata;
>>>> +    char *disp_name;
>>>> +    int acpi_index;
>>>> +    char *dt_name;
>>>> +    int ret;
>>>> +    int irq;
>>>> +    int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * We need to read only DP/DM/SS IRQ's here.
>>>> +     * So loop over from 1->3 and accordingly modify respective phy_irq[].
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    for (i = 1; i < MAX_PHY_IRQ; i++) {
>>>> +
>>>> +        if (!is_mp_supported && (port_index == 0)) {
>>>> +            if (i == DP_HS_PHY_IRQ) {
>>>> +                dt_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> +                    "dp_hs_phy_irq");
>>>> +                disp_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> +                    "qcom_dwc3 DP_HS");
>>>> +            } else if (i == DM_HS_PHY_IRQ) {
>>>> +                dt_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> +                    "dm_hs_phy_irq");
>>>> +                disp_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> +                    "qcom_dwc3 DM_HS");
>>>> +            } else if (i == SS_PHY_IRQ) {
>>>> +                dt_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> +                    "ss_phy_irq");
>>>> +                disp_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> +                    "qcom_dwc3 SS");
>> Bjorn, Konrad,
>>
>> If we are to remove this repetitive loops, we might need to make a 2D array for all of Dp/Dm/Ss interrutps and make a global array of names to be used for irq lookup and use them to reduce the if-else-if stuff here. If that is fine, I can make those changes, else I would like to stick to this approach for now because if we don't add the global array of names, prepping them seperately for dp/dm/ss would again lead us to making if-else loops like above.
>>
>> Please let me know your thoughts on this.
> Can we not just reuse the associated interrupt-names from the devicetree
> if present?
> 
Hi Konrad,

  Thanks for the comments but one more confirmation.
We can read the interrupts from DT but I believe the compatible would 
still need to stay. We need the num_ports information not just for 
registering interrupts but for modifying the pwr_event_irq registers 
during suspend/resume. If we rely on the interrupts to find the number 
of ports, the user is free to remove any IRQ and we might end up in a 
situation where glue and core are not having same view of how many 
number of ports present. So I believe its best to keep the compatible 
and get num_ports info from there and rely on reading interrupt-names to 
get interrupts cleanly. Can you let me know your view on the same.

Regards,
Krishna,