[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1143c305-df42-d823-fb52-4a32d39e0b7a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:12:21 +0800
From: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
CC: <seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<john.allen@....com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
<binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/19] KVM:VMX: Emulate read and write to CET MSRs
On 8/4/2023 4:28 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> + case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB:
>> + if (!kvm_cet_is_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
>> + return 1;
>> + if (is_noncanonical_address(data, vcpu))
>> + return 1;
>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(data, 4))
>> + return 1;
> Why should MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB be 4-byte aligned? I don't see
> this requirement in SDM.
It must be something wrong in my memory, thanks for catching it!
> IA32_INTERRUPT_SSP_TABLE_ADDR:
>
> Linear address of a table of seven shadow
> stack pointers that are selected in IA-32e
> mode using the IST index (when not 0) from
> the interrupt gate descriptor. (R/W)
> This MSR is not present on processors that
> do not support Intel 64 architecture. This
> field cannot represent a non-canonical
> address.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists