linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Support for the FriendlyElec NanoPC T6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 09 Aug 2023 12:43:50 +0200
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Thomas McKahan <tmckahan@...gleboardsolutions.com>
Cc:     Thomas McKahan <tmckahan@...gleboardsolutions.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Support for the FriendlyElec NanoPC T6

Hi Thomas,

Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2023, 07:42:08 CEST schrieb Thomas McKahan:
> Hello,
> 
> This adds support for the RK3588-based NanoPC T6 single board computer.
> Note this series is dependent on the PCIe 3 support [0] being
> upstreamed. The NanoPC T6 uses PCIe3x4 like the Rock 5B and EVB1.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230717173512.65169-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/
> 
> v2:
>  - remove unnecessary "okay" status from sound 
>  - add '-regulator' suffix on 2 regulators that were missing them
>  - use generic node name for rtc
>  - remove extra lines
>  - fix alignment in I2S entry
>  
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230802051441.3106-1-tmckahan@singleboardsolutions.com/
> 
> Thomas McKahan (2):
>   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add NanoPC T6
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: Add NanoPC T6

somehow the actual patches are missing from this submission?

I also checked the linux-rockchip archive, and they're missing
there too.

I guess you'll need to resend or check where they took the wrong exit.


Heiko