[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230809124806.45516-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 20:47:57 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] iommu/vt-d: Remove pasid_mutex
The pasid_mutex was used to protect the paths of set/remove_dev_pasid().
It's duplicate with iommu_sva_lock. Remove it to avoid duplicate code.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802212427.1497170-5-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 45 +++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index e95b339e9cdc..2a82864e9d57 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -259,8 +259,6 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops intel_mmuops = {
.invalidate_range = intel_invalidate_range,
};
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex);
-
static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
struct intel_svm **rsvm,
struct intel_svm_dev **rsdev)
@@ -268,10 +266,6 @@ static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL;
struct intel_svm *svm;
- /* The caller should hold the pasid_mutex lock */
- if (WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pasid_mutex)))
- return -EINVAL;
-
if (pasid == IOMMU_PASID_INVALID || pasid >= PASID_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -371,22 +365,19 @@ static int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-/* Caller must hold pasid_mutex */
-static int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
+void intel_svm_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
{
struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
struct intel_svm *svm;
struct mm_struct *mm;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, NULL, NULL);
if (!iommu)
- goto out;
+ return;
- ret = pasid_to_svm_sdev(dev, pasid, &svm, &sdev);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
+ if (pasid_to_svm_sdev(dev, pasid, &svm, &sdev))
+ return;
mm = svm->mm;
if (sdev) {
@@ -418,8 +409,6 @@ static int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
kfree(svm);
}
}
-out:
- return ret;
}
/* Page request queue descriptor */
@@ -520,19 +509,7 @@ static void intel_svm_drain_prq(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
goto prq_retry;
}
- /*
- * A work in IO page fault workqueue may try to lock pasid_mutex now.
- * Holding pasid_mutex while waiting in iopf_queue_flush_dev() for
- * all works in the workqueue to finish may cause deadlock.
- *
- * It's unnecessary to hold pasid_mutex in iopf_queue_flush_dev().
- * Unlock it to allow the works to be handled while waiting for
- * them to finish.
- */
- lockdep_assert_held(&pasid_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
iopf_queue_flush_dev(dev);
- mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
/*
* Perform steps described in VT-d spec CH7.10 to drain page
@@ -827,26 +804,14 @@ int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-void intel_svm_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
-{
- mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
- intel_svm_unbind_mm(dev, pasid);
- mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
-}
-
static int intel_svm_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
struct mm_struct *mm = domain->mm;
- int ret;
- mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
- ret = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
- mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ return intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
}
static void intel_svm_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists