| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:04:29 +0200
From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
jaka@...ux.ibm.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: horms@...nel.org, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 4/6] net/smc: support max connections per
lgr negotiation
On 07.08.23 08:27, Guangguan Wang wrote:
> Support max connections per lgr negotiation for SMCR v2.1,
> which is one of smc v2.1 features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 1 +
> net/smc/smc_clc.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/smc/smc_clc.h | 7 +++++--
> net/smc/smc_core.c | 4 +++-
> net/smc/smc_core.h | 5 +++++
> net/smc/smc_llc.c | 6 +++++-
> 6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index fd58e25beddf..b95d3fd48c28 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -1214,6 +1214,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc,
> memcpy(ini->peer_systemid, aclc->r0.lcl.id_for_peer, SMC_SYSTEMID_LEN);
> memcpy(ini->peer_gid, aclc->r0.lcl.gid, SMC_GID_SIZE);
> memcpy(ini->peer_mac, aclc->r0.lcl.mac, ETH_ALEN);
> + ini->max_conns = SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX;
>
> reason_code = smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(smc, aclc, ini);
> if (reason_code)
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> index 4f6b69af2b80..e2b224063dcc 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> @@ -427,9 +427,17 @@ static int smc_clc_fill_fce(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *fce,
> fce->fce_v20.os_type = SMC_CLC_OS_LINUX;
> fce->fce_v20.release = ini->release_ver;
> memcpy(fce->fce_v20.hostname, smc_hostname, sizeof(smc_hostname));
> - if (ini->is_smcd && ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> + if (ini->is_smcd && ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1) {
> ret = sizeof(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (ini->release_ver >= SMC_RELEASE_1) {
> + if (!ini->is_smcd)
> + fce->max_conns = ini->max_conns;
> + }
>
> +out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -931,8 +939,10 @@ int smc_clc_send_proposal(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> sizeof(struct smc_clc_smcd_gid_chid);
> }
> }
> - if (smcr_indicated(ini->smc_type_v2))
> + if (smcr_indicated(ini->smc_type_v2)) {
> memcpy(v2_ext->roce, ini->smcrv2.ib_gid_v2, SMC_GID_SIZE);
> + v2_ext->max_conns = SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX;
> + }
>
> pclc_base->hdr.length = htons(plen);
> memcpy(trl->eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER));
> @@ -1163,6 +1173,11 @@ int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc,
> {
> struct smc_clc_v2_extension *pclc_v2_ext;
>
> + /* default max conn is SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX(255),
> + * which is the default value in smc v1 and v2.0.
> + */
> + ini->max_conns = SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX;
> +
> if ((!(ini->smcd_version & SMC_V2) && !(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2)) ||
> ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> return 0;
> @@ -1171,15 +1186,30 @@ int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc,
> if (!pclc_v2_ext)
> return SMC_CLC_DECL_NOV2EXT;
>
> + if (ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2) {
> + ini->max_conns = min_t(u8, pclc_v2_ext->max_conns, SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX);
> + if (ini->max_conns < SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MIN)
> + return SMC_CLC_DECL_MAXCONNERR;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce,
> struct smc_init_info *ini)
> {
> + struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *fce_v2x =
> + (struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *)fce;
> +
> if (ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> return 0;
>
> + if (!ini->is_smcd) {
> + if (fce_v2x->max_conns < SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MIN)
> + return SMC_CLC_DECL_MAXCONNERR;
> + ini->max_conns = fce_v2x->max_conns;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1190,6 +1220,8 @@ int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc,
> (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)cclc;
> struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
> smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, ini->is_smcd);
> + struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *fce_v2x =
> + (struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *)fce;
>
> if (cclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1 ||
> !(cclc->hdr.typev2 & SMC_FIRST_CONTACT_MASK))
> @@ -1201,6 +1233,11 @@ int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc,
> if (fce->release < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> return 0;
>
> + if (!ini->is_smcd) {
> + if (fce_v2x->max_conns != ini->max_conns)
> + return SMC_CLC_DECL_MAXCONNERR;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
ok, now I have the answer from the last patch.
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.h b/net/smc/smc_clc.h
> index 66932bfdc6d0..54077e50c368 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSMCD2DEV 0x03030007 /* no SMC-Dv2 device found */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOUEID 0x03030008 /* peer sent no UEID */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR 0x03030009 /* release version negotiate failed */
> +#define SMC_CLC_DECL_MAXCONNERR 0x0303000a /* max connections negotiate failed */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_MODEUNSUPP 0x03040000 /* smc modes do not match (R or D)*/
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_RMBE_EC 0x03050000 /* peer has eyecatcher in RMBE */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_OPTUNSUPP 0x03060000 /* fastopen sockopt not supported */
> @@ -134,7 +135,8 @@ struct smc_clc_smcd_gid_chid {
> struct smc_clc_v2_extension {
> struct smc_clnt_opts_area_hdr hdr;
> u8 roce[16]; /* RoCEv2 GID */
> - u8 reserved[16];
> + u8 max_conns;
> + u8 reserved[15];
> u8 user_eids[][SMC_MAX_EID_LEN];
> };
>
> @@ -236,7 +238,8 @@ struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext {
>
> struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x {
> struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext fce_v20;
> - u8 reserved3[4];
> + u8 max_conns; /* for SMC-R only */
> + u8 reserved3[3];
> __be32 vendor_exp_options;
> u8 reserved4[8];
> } __packed; /* format defined in
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> index 6aa3db47a956..5de1fbaa6e28 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> @@ -895,9 +895,11 @@ static int smc_lgr_create(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> lgr->uses_gateway = ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway;
> memcpy(lgr->nexthop_mac, ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac,
> ETH_ALEN);
> + lgr->max_conns = ini->max_conns;
> } else {
> ibdev = ini->ib_dev;
> ibport = ini->ib_port;
> + lgr->max_conns = SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX;
It is kind of confused sometimes SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX is used and
sometimes SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX. IMO, you can use SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX in
the patches series for the new feature, because they are the same value
and the name is more suiable.
> }
> memcpy(lgr->pnet_id, ibdev->pnetid[ibport - 1],
> SMC_MAX_PNETID_LEN);
> @@ -1890,7 +1892,7 @@ int smc_conn_create(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> (ini->smcd_version == SMC_V2 ||
> lgr->vlan_id == ini->vlan_id) &&
> (role == SMC_CLNT || ini->is_smcd ||
> - (lgr->conns_num < SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX &&
> + (lgr->conns_num < lgr->max_conns &&
> !bitmap_full(lgr->rtokens_used_mask, SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX)))) {
> /* link group found */
> ini->first_contact_local = 0;
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
> index 1a97fef39127..f4f7299c810a 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #include "smc_ib.h"
>
> #define SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX 255 /* max. # of RMBs per link group */
> +#define SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX 255 /* max. # of connections per link group */
> +#define SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MIN 16 /* min. # of connections per link group */
>
> struct smc_lgr_list { /* list of link group definition */
> struct list_head list;
> @@ -331,6 +333,8 @@ struct smc_link_group {
> __be32 saddr;
> /* net namespace */
> struct net *net;
> + u8 max_conns;
> + /* max conn can be assigned to lgr */
> };
> struct { /* SMC-D */
> u64 peer_gid;
> @@ -375,6 +379,7 @@ struct smc_init_info {
> u8 smc_type_v1;
> u8 smc_type_v2;
> u8 release_ver;
> + u8 max_conns;
> u8 first_contact_peer;
> u8 first_contact_local;
> unsigned short vlan_id;
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
> index 90f0b60b196a..5347b62f1518 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ struct smc_llc_msg_confirm_link { /* type 0x01 */
> u8 link_num;
> u8 link_uid[SMC_LGR_ID_SIZE];
> u8 max_links;
> - u8 reserved[9];
> + u8 max_conns;
> + u8 reserved[8];
> };
>
> #define SMC_LLC_FLAG_ADD_LNK_REJ 0x40
> @@ -472,6 +473,9 @@ int smc_llc_send_confirm_link(struct smc_link *link,
> confllc->link_num = link->link_id;
> memcpy(confllc->link_uid, link->link_uid, SMC_LGR_ID_SIZE);
> confllc->max_links = SMC_LLC_ADD_LNK_MAX_LINKS;
> + if (link->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2 &&
> + link->lgr->peer_smc_release >= SMC_RELEASE_1)
> + confllc->max_conns = link->lgr->max_conns;
> /* send llc message */
> rc = smc_wr_tx_send(link, pend);
> put_out:
Did I miss the negotiation process somewhere for the following scenario?
(Example 4 in the document)
Client Server
Proposal(max conns(16))
----------------------->
Accept(max conns(32))
<-----------------------
Confirm(max conns(32))
----------------------->
Powered by blists - more mailing lists