[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c07aba63-6ca0-4889-aa98-30248f86c313@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:29:49 -0500
From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Iain Lane <iain@...ngesquash.org.uk>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/9] PCI: Split PME state selection into a local
static function
On 8/10/2023 11:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 01:54:52PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> When a device is not power manageable by the platform, and not already
>> in a low power state pci_target_state() will find the deepest state
>> that PME is supported and use this to select the wakeup state.
>>
>> Simplify this logic and split it out to a local function. No intended
>> functional changes.
>
> ...
>
>> +static inline pci_power_t pci_get_wake_pme_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + pci_power_t state = PCI_D3hot;
>> +
>> + while (state && !(dev->pme_support & (1 << state)))
>> + state--;
>> +
>> + return state;
>
> Sparse won't be happy about this code (with CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__).
>
> Basically it's something like
>
> return (__force pci_power_t)fls(dev->pme_support & GENMASK(PCI_D3hot, 0));
>
> (but double check and test the logic).
>
>> +}
>
> ...
>
> Yeah, I see that is the existing code, perhaps amend it first?
>
Are you sure? I actually double checked the sparse output using this
command before I sent it.
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' drivers/pci/pci.o
I didn't see anything related to the line numbers for this function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists