linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq4019: correct SDHCI XO clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 19:56:46 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq4019: correct SDHCI XO clock

On 10.08.2023 15:28, Robert Marko wrote:
> Using GCC_DCD_XO_CLK as the XO clock for SDHCI controller is not correct,
> it seems that I somehow made a mistake of passing it instead of the fixed
> XO clock.
> 
> Fixes: 04b3b72b5b8f ("ARM: dts: qcom: ipq4019: Add SDHCI controller node")
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
> ---
Is this another IPQ without RPM?

If so, this patch looks good, but please take the liberty to make clocks
and clock-names one-per-line :)

Konrad