[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230810145938-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:02:45 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>
Cc: xieyongji@...edance.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
david.marchand@...hat.com, lulu@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] vduse: add support for networking devices
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This small series enables virtio-net device type in VDUSE.
> With it, basic operation have been tested, both with
> virtio-vdpa and vhost-vdpa using DPDK Vhost library series
> adding VDUSE support using split rings layout (merged in
> DPDK v23.07-rc1).
>
> Control queue support (and so multiqueue) has also been
> tested, but requires a Kernel series from Jason Wang
> relaxing control queue polling [1] to function reliably.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CACGkMEtgrxN3PPwsDo4oOsnsSLJfEmBEZ0WvjGRr3whU+QasUg@mail.gmail.com/T/
>
> RFC -> v1 changes:
> ==================
> - Fail device init if it does not support VERSION_1 (Jason)
So I can put this in next, the issue I think is
that of security: currently selinux can if necessary block
access to creating virtio block devices.
But if we have more than one type we need a way for selinux to
block specific types. Can be a patch on top but pls work to
address.
Another question is that with this userspace can inject
packets directly into net stack. Should we check CAP_NET_ADMIN
or such?
> Maxime Coquelin (2):
> vduse: validate block features only with block devices
> vduse: enable Virtio-net device type
>
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists