[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230810203640.GE212435@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 22:36:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 26/30] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:38:04PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> The wait for control loop in which the siblings are waiting for the
> microcode update on the primary thread must be protected against
> instrumentation as instrumentation can end up in #INT3, #DB or #PF, which
> then returns with IRET. That IRET reenables NMI which is the opposite of
> what the NMI rendezvouz is trying to achieve.
asm_exc_nmi will re-enable NMIs when DEBUG_ENTRY before we reach C.
Late loading had better depend on !DEBUG_ENTRY.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists