linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/92] 5.15.126-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEUSe79ibvfBR6epj=BhysfrKV47zBAFLZr7j=ZP+-Lf4NzuTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:54:10 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/92] 5.15.126-rc1 review

Hello!

On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 04:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.126 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:36:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.126-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------

We are also seeing build failures on Arm and Arm64, with Clang 17 and GCC 8:

* arm, build
  - clang-17-defconfig
  - clang-17-lkftconfig
  - clang-17-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
  - clang-lkftconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - gcc-8-defconfig

* arm64, build
  - clang-17-defconfig
  - clang-17-defconfig-40bc7ee5
  - clang-17-lkftconfig
  - clang-17-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
  - clang-lkftconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - gcc-8-defconfig
  - gcc-8-defconfig-40bc7ee5

Failure is:

-----8<-----
/builds/linux/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c:39:13: error: duplicate
member 'irq'
   39 |         int irq;
      |             ^~~
/builds/linux/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c: In function 'smc_chan_setup':
/builds/linux/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c:118:34: error: 'irq'
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'rq'?
  118 |                 scmi_info->irq = irq;
      |                                  ^~~
      |                                  rq
----->8-----

(Funnily enough, this was reported by Naresh [1] before this RC round,
but we chalked it up to GCC-13 on an older branch.)

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYvTjm2oa6mXR=HUe6gYuVaS2nFb_otuvPfmPeKHDoC+Tw@mail.gmail.com/