[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQ4ttkSLTBCrXNZSBR1FP9UZ_gUHmo0BS37LCdyBmUeyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:32:53 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, keescook@...omium.org,
john.johansen@...onical.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, mic@...ikod.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:44 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Add three system calls for the Linux Security Module ABI ...
I had a small comment on the SELinux patch, but that's oh so very
minor and not worth respinning in my opinion; I can fix that up with a
follow-up patch once the patchset is merged.
I was also happy to see that John had a chance to look everything
over, especially the AppArmor bits, that's good.
Mickaël had a lot of good comments on the selftest patch, and of all
the LSMs I believe he has done the most work with the kernel's
selftest functionality so it would be nice to have him look over the
latest revision in this patchset. I know he is busy at the moment,
but I'm hopeful he will have an opportunity to look at it in the
second half of next week.
Assuming the selftests look good to Mickaël, and no one else
identifies any problems, I think we're on track to merge this into
lsm/next after the upcoming merge window closes :) Thanks a lot
Casey, I appreciate all the work you've put into this patchset.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists