[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC=S1nhi6Tk31a2wayVybcBdmE=wngawzoaz8B-4L9UXpqzD3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:36:55 +0800
From: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
To: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@...iatek.com>,
Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@...iatek.com>,
Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
Shawn Sung <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/mediatek: Fix using wrong drm private data to
bind mediatek-drm
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 2:15 AM Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> According to mtk_drm_kms_init(), the all_drm_private array in each
> drm private data stores all drm private data in display path order.
>
> In mtk_drm_get_all_drm_priv(), each element in all_drm_priv should have one
> display path private data, such as:
> all_drm_priv[CRTC_MAIN] should only have main_path data
> all_drm_priv[CRTC_EXT] should only have ext_path data
> all_drm_priv[CRTC_THIRD] should only have third_path data
>
> So we need to add the length checking for each display path before
> assigning their drm private data into all_drm_priv array.
>
> Then the all_drm_private array in each drm private data needs to be
> assigned in their display path order.
>
> Fixes: 1ef7ed48356c ("drm/mediatek: Modify mediatek-drm for mt8195 multi mmsys support")
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists