[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:11:06 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, gautham.shenoy@....com,
kprateek.nayak@....com, aaron.lu@...el.com,
wuyun.abel@...edance.com, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS
Hi David,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.5-rc5 next-20230809]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Vernet/sched-Expose-move_queued_task-from-core-c/20230810-061611
base: tip/sched/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809221218.163894-7-void%40manifault.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS
config: sparc-randconfig-r015-20230809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/sched/core.c:9768:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_update_domains' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
9768 | void sched_update_domains(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:89:
kernel/sched/topology.c: In function 'sched_init_domains':
>> kernel/sched/topology.c:2580:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'sched_update_domains'; did you mean 'sched_update_scaling'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2580 | sched_update_domains();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| sched_update_scaling
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2580 kernel/sched/topology.c
2558
2559 /*
2560 * Set up scheduler domains and groups. For now this just excludes isolated
2561 * CPUs, but could be used to exclude other special cases in the future.
2562 */
2563 int __init sched_init_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
2564 {
2565 int err;
2566
2567 zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask, GFP_KERNEL);
2568 zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask2, GFP_KERNEL);
2569 zalloc_cpumask_var(&fallback_doms, GFP_KERNEL);
2570
2571 arch_update_cpu_topology();
2572 asym_cpu_capacity_scan();
2573 ndoms_cur = 1;
2574 doms_cur = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms_cur);
2575 if (!doms_cur)
2576 doms_cur = &fallback_doms;
2577 cpumask_and(doms_cur[0], cpu_map, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN));
2578 err = build_sched_domains(doms_cur[0], NULL);
2579 if (!err)
> 2580 sched_update_domains();
2581
2582 return err;
2583 }
2584
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists