linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] mm: Add policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:13:16 +0800
From:   Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
To:     hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wuyun.abel@...edance.com, robin.lu@...edance.com,
        Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] mm: Add policy_name to identify OOM policies

This patch adds a new metadata policy_name in oom_control and report it
in dump_header(), so we can know what has been the selection policy. In
BPF program, we can call kfunc set_oom_policy_name to set the current
user-defined policy name. The in-kernel policy_name is "default".

Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
---
 include/linux/oom.h |  7 +++++++
 mm/oom_kill.c       | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index 7d0c9c48a0c5..69d0f2ec6ea6 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ enum oom_constraint {
 	CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,
 };
 
+enum {
+	POLICY_NAME_LEN = 16,
+};
+
 /*
  * Details of the page allocation that triggered the oom killer that are used to
  * determine what should be killed.
@@ -52,6 +56,9 @@ struct oom_control {
 
 	/* Used to print the constraint info. */
 	enum oom_constraint constraint;
+
+	/* Used to report the policy info. */
+	char policy_name[POLICY_NAME_LEN];
 };
 
 extern struct mutex oom_lock;
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 255c9ef1d808..3239dcdba4d7 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -443,6 +443,35 @@ static int dump_task(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+__bpf_kfunc void set_oom_policy_name(struct oom_control *oc, const char *src, size_t sz)
+{
+	memset(oc->policy_name, 0, sizeof(oc->policy_name));
+
+	if (sz > POLICY_NAME_LEN)
+		sz = POLICY_NAME_LEN;
+
+	memcpy(oc->policy_name, src, sz);
+}
+
+__diag_push();
+__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
+		  "kfuncs which will be used in BPF programs");
+
+__weak noinline void bpf_set_policy_name(struct oom_control *oc)
+{
+}
+
+__diag_pop();
+
+BTF_SET8_START(bpf_oom_policy_kfunc_ids)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, set_oom_policy_name)
+BTF_SET8_END(bpf_oom_policy_kfunc_ids)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_oom_policy_kfunc_set = {
+	.owner          = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set            = &bpf_oom_policy_kfunc_ids,
+};
+
 /**
  * dump_tasks - dump current memory state of all system tasks
  * @oc: pointer to struct oom_control
@@ -484,8 +513,8 @@ static void dump_oom_summary(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *victim)
 
 static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	pr_warn("%s invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=%#x(%pGg), order=%d, oom_score_adj=%hd\n",
-		current->comm, oc->gfp_mask, &oc->gfp_mask, oc->order,
+	pr_warn("%s invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=%#x(%pGg), order=%d, policy_name=%s, oom_score_adj=%hd\n",
+		current->comm, oc->gfp_mask, &oc->gfp_mask, oc->order, oc->policy_name,
 			current->signal->oom_score_adj);
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && oc->order)
 		pr_warn("COMPACTION is disabled!!!\n");
@@ -775,8 +804,11 @@ static int __init oom_init(void)
 	err = register_btf_fmodret_id_set(&oom_bpf_fmodret_set);
 	if (err)
 		pr_warn("error while registering oom fmodret entrypoints: %d", err);
+	err = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
+					&bpf_oom_policy_kfunc_set);
+	if (err)
+		pr_warn("error while registering oom kfunc entrypoints: %d", err);
 #endif
-
 	return 0;
 }
 subsys_initcall(oom_init)
@@ -1196,6 +1228,10 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
 		return true;
 	}
 
+	set_oom_policy_name(oc, "default", sizeof("default"));
+
+	bpf_set_policy_name(oc);
+
 	select_bad_process(oc);
 	/* Found nothing?!?! */
 	if (!oc->chosen) {
-- 
2.20.1