linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/36] tty: change tty_write_lock()'s ndelay parameter to bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230810091510.13006-6-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:14:39 +0200
From:   "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/36] tty: change tty_write_lock()'s ndelay parameter to bool

It's a yes-no parameter, so convert it to bool to be obvious.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/tty/tty.h       | 2 +-
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c    | 6 +++---
 drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty.h b/drivers/tty/tty.h
index 89769a1f1f97..2751ac3946e7 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty.h
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int tty_check_change(struct tty_struct *tty);
 void __stop_tty(struct tty_struct *tty);
 void __start_tty(struct tty_struct *tty);
 void tty_write_unlock(struct tty_struct *tty);
-int tty_write_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, int ndelay);
+int tty_write_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, bool ndelay);
 void tty_vhangup_session(struct tty_struct *tty);
 void tty_open_proc_set_tty(struct file *filp, struct tty_struct *tty);
 int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct *tty, int exit_session);
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index eb4e2e0e300d..54036a20a102 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ void tty_write_unlock(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&tty->write_wait, EPOLLOUT);
 }
 
-int tty_write_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, int ndelay)
+int tty_write_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, bool ndelay)
 {
 	if (!mutex_trylock(&tty->atomic_write_lock)) {
 		if (ndelay)
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ int tty_send_xchar(struct tty_struct *tty, char ch)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (tty_write_lock(tty, 0) < 0)
+	if (tty_write_lock(tty, false) < 0)
 		return -ERESTARTSYS;
 
 	down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
@@ -2486,7 +2486,7 @@ static int send_break(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int duration)
 		retval = tty->ops->break_ctl(tty, duration);
 	else {
 		/* Do the work ourselves */
-		if (tty_write_lock(tty, 0) < 0)
+		if (tty_write_lock(tty, false) < 0)
 			return -EINTR;
 		retval = tty->ops->break_ctl(tty, -1);
 		if (retval)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
index 2e88b414cf95..e3e1318f53fd 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty, void __user *arg, int opt)
 		if (retval < 0)
 			return retval;
 
-		if (tty_write_lock(tty, 0) < 0)
+		if (tty_write_lock(tty, false) < 0)
 			goto retry_write_wait;
 
 		/* Racing writer? */
-- 
2.41.0