[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230810091510.13006-23-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:14:56 +0200
From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 22/36] tty: rename and de-inline do_tty_write()
Make do_tty_write()'s name sound similar to iterate_tty_read(). They
both do similar things, so there is no reason for so distinct names. The
new name is therefore iterate_tty_write().
Drop the unnedeed inline modifier too. Let the compiler decide.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
---
drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index ea5041fbbf28..846460c02c58 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -961,8 +961,8 @@ int tty_write_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, bool ndelay)
* Split writes up in sane blocksizes to avoid
* denial-of-service type attacks
*/
-static inline ssize_t do_tty_write(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty,
- struct file *file, struct iov_iter *from)
+static ssize_t iterate_tty_write(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty,
+ struct file *file, struct iov_iter *from)
{
size_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
ssize_t ret, written = 0;
@@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ static ssize_t file_tty_write(struct file *file, struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_
if (!ld->ops->write)
ret = -EIO;
else
- ret = do_tty_write(ld, tty, file, from);
+ ret = iterate_tty_write(ld, tty, file, from);
tty_ldisc_deref(ld);
return ret;
}
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists