[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a92c349-8c72-db98-3fff-9a7d8a6b04fb@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:19:32 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 - RESEND 01/10] drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Add new
sched_task() callback
On 8/10/23 15:11, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:35:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> I am just wondering - would it be possible for you to take this pre-requisite
>> patch stand alone for the upcoming merge window. This has been acked by Mark
>> earlier. Besides, I am also working on your other suggestions on the series,
>> and will respond soon. Thank you.
>
> I can if it helps in some way, but I'm not seeing how it does. Can't you
> just carry this along with the BRBE changes that use it? How does it benefit
> anybody on its own?
It might help de-clutter our conversation and focus on BRBE specific
implementation stuff next time around in V14. Also this change here
is quite harmless for any other thing, hence without much risk.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists