linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ralink: rt2x00: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:18:28 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, stf_xl@...pl,
        helmut.schaa@...glemail.com, kvalo@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ralink: rt2x00: "foo* bar" should be "foo
 *bar"

On 10/08/2023 13:53, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 09:10 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>> And the email address doesn't even work, only about two weeks after you
>>> sent this patch?
>>>
>>>   hanyu001@...suo.com
>>>     host mx1.qiye.aliyun.com [47.246.146.58]
>>>     SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<hanyu001@...suo.com>:
>>>     554 RCPT (hanyu001@...suo.com) dosn't exist
>>>
>>
>> No wonder why @208suo.com people ignore reviews from mailing list - their
>> addresses are send-only without real mailboxes...
>>
>> BTW, how can you get above error message? I'm curious.
> 
> That was just the error message I got back from my mail server,
> presumably now that you actually tried emailing them, you also got one.
> 

Ack, I also got above delivery failure notification, hence removing
Yu Han from address list.

> I'm beginning to think we should just block that whole domain until
> someone there is actually willing to _interact_, not just throw
> (garbage!) patches over the fence.
> 

Ack too! I'm leaning towards blocking for sanity of myself and
mailing lists. IMO, we should have done the same against @cdjrlc.com
addresses when they sent spelling fixes that are 50-50 correct but
they also ignored change-requested reviews.

Thanks!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara