linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] docs/zh_TW: update zh_TW's documentation from an ascensive aspect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:24:57 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Hu Haowen <src.res.211@...il.com>
Cc:     Hu Haowen <src.res.211@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] docs/zh_TW: update zh_TW's documentation from an
 ascensive aspect

Hu Haowen <src.res.211@...il.com> writes:

> Update zh_TW's documentation concentrating on the following aspects:
>
>     * The file tree structure changes of the main documentation;
>     * Some changes and ideas from zh_CN translation;
>     * Removal for several obsoleted contents within the zh_TW translation
>       or those which are not exising anymore in the main documentation.
>     * Replacements for some incorrect words and phrases in traditional
>       Chinese or those which are odd within their context being hard for
>       readers to comprehend.
>
> v3:
>     * Remove the fancy character thoroughly asked by Corbet.
>
> v2:
>     * Remove the fancy character U+feff (ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE) reported by Corbet
>       in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87bkg5dp6x.fsf@meer.lwn.net/.
>
> v1:
>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230720132729.1821-1-src.res.211@gmail.com/
>

So this series does not even come close to applying to docs-next; it
includes things like the email-address change that you sent me a month
ago.  What are you generating it against?

Please.  We have been through a few too many rounds of this at this
point.  If you can send me something I can apply against my tree, I'll
look at it, but *make sure* it's a reasonable patch series before you
send it again.

jon