lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230811-topic-7280_lmhirq-v1-1-c262b6a25c8f@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:58:22 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFT] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add missing LMH interrupts

Hook up the interrupts that signal the Limits Management Hardware has
started some sort of throttling action.

Fixes: 7dbd121a2c58 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpufreq hw node")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
---
test case:

- hammer the CPUs (like compile the Linux kernel)
- watch -n1 "cat /proc/interrupts | grep dcvsh"
- the numbers go up up up up -> good
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 925428a5f6ae..76ed32c8d6f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -5363,6 +5363,14 @@ cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@...91000 {
 			reg = <0 0x18591000 0 0x1000>,
 			      <0 0x18592000 0 0x1000>,
 			      <0 0x18593000 0 0x1000>;
+
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			interrupt-names = "dcvsh-irq-0",
+					  "dcvsh-irq-1",
+					  "dcvsh-irq-2";
+
 			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_GPLL0>;
 			clock-names = "xo", "alternate";
 			#freq-domain-cells = <1>;

---
base-commit: 21ef7b1e17d039053edaeaf41142423810572741
change-id: 20230811-topic-7280_lmhirq-e07ad2530387

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ