[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cc56fb5-ddba-b6d0-f66b-aa8fffa42af0@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:50:51 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, dlemoal@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v14 00/11] Implement copy offload support
On 8/11/23 03:52, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> We achieve copy offload by sending 2 bio's with source and destination
> info and merge them to form a request. This request is sent to driver.
> So this design works only for request based storage drivers.
[ ... ]
> Overall series supports:
> ========================
> 1. Driver
> - NVMe Copy command (single NS, TP 4065), including support
> in nvme-target (for block and file back end).
>
> 2. Block layer
> - Block-generic copy (REQ_OP_COPY_DST/SRC), operation with
> interface accommodating two block-devs
> - Merging copy requests in request layer
> - Emulation, for in-kernel user when offload is natively
> absent
> - dm-linear support (for cases not requiring split)
>
> 3. User-interface
> - copy_file_range
Is this sufficient? The combination of dm-crypt, dm-linear and the NVMe
driver is very common. What is the plan for supporting dm-crypt?
Shouldn't bio splitting be supported for dm-linear?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists