| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230811045127.3308641-6-rananta@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 04:51:18 +0000
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 05/14] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Make kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range() visible in common code and create a
default implementation that just invalidates the whole TLB.
This paves the way for several future features/cleanups:
- Introduction of range-based TLBI on ARM.
- Eliminating kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot()
- Moving the KVM/x86 TDP MMU to common code.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 10 ++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 3 ---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 11 +++++++++++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a2d3cfc2eb75c..b547d17c58f63 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1804,6 +1804,8 @@ static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
+#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS_RANGE
+
#define kvm_arch_pmi_in_guest(vcpu) \
((vcpu) && (vcpu)->arch.handling_intr_from_guest)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index ec169f5c7dce2..00f7bda9202f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -278,16 +278,14 @@ static inline bool kvm_available_flush_remote_tlbs_range(void)
return kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range;
}
-void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn,
- gfn_t nr_pages)
+int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
{
int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range)
- ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, start_gfn,
- nr_pages);
- if (ret)
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages);
+
+ return ret;
}
static gfn_t kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index d39af5639ce97..86cb83bb34804 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -170,9 +170,6 @@ bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn,
int min_level);
-void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn,
- gfn_t nr_pages);
-
/* Flush the given page (huge or not) of guest memory. */
static inline void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, int level)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index ade5d4500c2ce..89d2614e4b7a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1359,6 +1359,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_yield_to(struct kvm_vcpu *target);
void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool yield_to_kernel_mode);
void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
+void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages);
#ifdef KVM_ARCH_NR_OBJS_PER_MEMORY_CACHE
int kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc, int min);
@@ -1488,6 +1489,16 @@ static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
#endif
+#ifndef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS_RANGE
+static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
+ gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+#else
+int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages);
+#endif
+
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
void kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma(struct kvm *kvm);
void kvm_arch_unregister_noncoherent_dma(struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index d6b0507861550..26e91000f579d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -366,6 +366,19 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_flush_remote_tlbs);
+void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
+{
+ if (!kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn, nr_pages))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Fall back to a flushing entire TLBs if the architecture range-based
+ * TLB invalidation is unsupported or can't be performed for whatever
+ * reason.
+ */
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+}
+
static void kvm_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
{
kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(kvm);
--
2.41.0.640.ga95def55d0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists