[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87il9mccxi.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:26:17 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] memory tiering: calculate abstract distance
based on ACPI HMAT
Hi, Rao,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com> writes:
> On 24-Jul-23 11:28 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:15:31 +1000 Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for this Huang, I had been hoping to take a look at it this week
>>> but have run out of time. I'm keen to do some testing with it as well.
>>
>> Thanks. I'll queue this in mm-unstable for some testing. Detailed
>> review and testing would be appreciated.
>
> I gave this series a try on a 2P system with 2 CXL cards. I don't trust the
> bandwidth and latency numbers reported by HMAT here, but FWIW, this patchset
> puts the CXL nodes on a lower tier than DRAM nodes.
Thank you very much!
Can I add your "Tested-by" for the series?
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists