[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230810172858.12291fe6@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:28:58 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Kolesa <daniel@...aforge.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Sven Volkinsfeld <thyrc@....net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/bugs] x86/srso: Fix build breakage with the LLVM
 linker
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:25:24 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:11:48 -0000 tip-bot2 for Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged into the x86/bugs branch of tip:  
> 
> Hi folks, is there an ETA on this getting to Linus?
> The breakage has propagated to the networking trees, if the fix reaches
> Linus soon we'll just hold off on applying stuff and fast forward again.
Are the commit IDs stable on x86/bugs? 
Would it be rude if we pulled that in?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists