linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu: Move iopf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74234ff1-492c-5934-49b6-69b08b732b91@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:55:07 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu: Move iopf_handler() to iommu-sva.c

On 2023/8/11 3:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:48:34PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The iopf_handler() function handles a fault_group for a SVA domain. Move
>> it to the right place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h  | 17 +++++++++++++
>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c | 50 +++-----------------------------------
>>   drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c  | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
>> index 05c0fb2acbc4..ab42cfdd7636 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
>> @@ -219,3 +219,52 @@ void mm_pasid_drop(struct mm_struct *mm)
> 
>> +static void iopf_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct iopf_fault *iopf;
>> +	struct iopf_group *group;
>> +	struct iommu_domain *domain;
>> +	enum iommu_page_response_code status = IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS;
>> +
>> +	group = container_of(work, struct iopf_group, work);
>> +	domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(group->dev,
>> +				group->last_fault.fault.prm.pasid, 0);
>> +	if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler)
>> +		status = IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(iopf, &group->faults, list) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * For the moment, errors are sticky: don't handle subsequent
>> +		 * faults in the group if there is an error.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (status == IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS)
>> +			status = domain->iopf_handler(&iopf->fault,
>> +						      domain->fault_data);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	iopf_complete_group(group->dev, &group->last_fault, status);
>> +	iopf_free_group(group);
>> +}
> 
> Routing faults to domains is generic code, not SVA code.

You are right. This happens in the latter patch.

> SVA starts at domain->iopf_handler
> 
> Jason
> 

Best regards,
baolu