linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: mediatek-ge-soc: support PHY LEDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9727375d-8d89-489b-bd3f-4f18930ff42c@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:13:38 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc:     Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>,
        SkyLake Huang <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: mediatek-ge-soc: support PHY LEDs

>  
> +#define MTK_PHY_LED_STATE_FORCE_ON	BIT(0)
> +#define MTK_PHY_LED_STATE_FORCE_BLINK	BIT(1)
> +#define MTK_PHY_LED_STATE_NETDEV	BIT(2)
> +struct mtk_socphy_priv {
> +	unsigned long		led_state;
> +};

Hi Daniel

A blank line between the #defines and the struct would be nice.

> +
> +struct mtk_socphy_shared {
> +	u32			boottrap;
> +	struct mtk_socphy_priv	priv[4];
> +};
> +
>  static int mtk_socphy_read_page(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  {
>  	return __phy_read(phydev, MTK_EXT_PAGE_ACCESS);
> @@ -1071,6 +1112,370 @@ static int mt798x_phy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  	return mt798x_phy_calibration(phydev);
>  }
>  
> +static int mt798x_phy_hw_led_on_set(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 index,
> +				    bool on)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_socphy_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> +	u32 mask = MTK_PHY_LED_STATE_FORCE_ON << (index ? 16 : 0);
> +	bool changed;

Reverse christmass tree please.

Otherwise, this looks good.

	   Andrew