linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: mediatek-ge-soc: support PHY LEDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03763b62-8d49-6fbf-5ce9-21c334c9aac2@linux.dev>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:44:55 +0100
From:   Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>,
        SkyLake Huang <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: mediatek-ge-soc: support PHY LEDs

On 11/08/2023 17:39, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> +	/* Only now setup pinctrl to avoid bogus blinking */
>>> +	pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select(&phydev->mdio.dev, "gbe-led");
>>
>> This function gets reference on phydev->mdio.dev, but there is no code
>> to release it. It looks like a leak which will prevent module unload,
>> but I don't have hardware now to prove it.
> 
> Since it is a devm_ function, it should get released when the device
> is destroyed. Or am i missing something?
> 

Oh, got it. Yeah, resource managed code needs no explicit *put() calls.
Thanks for the clarification.