[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a5uwr7ya.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 10:17:01 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...khorst.se>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Move binding to display driver outside of deferred probe
On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 16:26:53 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/7/23 04:00, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Now that we can use -EPROBE_DEFER, it's no longer required to spin off
> > the snd_hdac_i915_init into a workqueue.
> >
> > Use the -EPROBE_DEFER mechanism instead, which must be returned in the
> > probe function.
>
> I don't think this patch is aligned with the previous discussions. What
> we agreed on is that snd_hdac_i915_init() would be called from and not
> from the workqueue.
>
> But this patch also moves all codec initialization out of the workqueue.
>
> I think we need two callbacks for device-specific initilization, one
> that is called from the probe function and one from the workqueue,
> otherwise we'll have a structure that differs from the snd-hda-intel -
> which would be rather silly in terms of support/debug.
>
> I realize there's quite a bit of surgery involved, and most likely the
> SOF folks should provide this patch for you to build on.
So this patch looks like the only significant concern in the whole
patch set. Can we reach to some agreement for merging to 6.6 in time?
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists