linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] TI-Nspire cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <484a1fb8-cba3-4fa8-9f37-21caf8ba6fc3@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Aug 2023 11:53:04 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Fabian Vogt" <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>,
        "Lee Jones" <lee@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "Daniel Tang" <dt.tangr@...il.com>, "Andrew Davis" <afd@...com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] TI-Nspire cleanups

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023, at 17:13, Fabian Vogt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 2. August 2023, 17:33:24 CEST schrieb Andrew Davis:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> This series is an extended version of the series started here[0]
>> and here[1].
>> 
>> We break out what was the first patch into one for DTS change and
>> one for code changes as suggested by Krzysztof. Those are now patches
>> 1 and 8 of this series (I kept the ACKs, hope that is okay).
>> 
>> While I was adding that, I noticed some other dtbs_check issues,
>> so while here fixed some of those up too (patches 2-6).
>
> Whole series applied on top of cacc6e22932f and confirmed to work:
>
> Tested-by: Fabian Vogt <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>

I've added all 9 patches to the soc tree now, the first seven
in the soc/dt branch, the other two in the soc/arm branch.

This does mean that the soc/arm branch has a minor regression
when tested by itself, as it won't be able to restart the
system, which is a regression we'd still get with old dtb
files, but I think this is acceptable here since it does not
impact normal operation, and there is a very small user base
that is affected by this.

Thanks,

       Arnd