lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308122212.SOHP09RP-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Aug 2023 22:46:02 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM
 support

Hi Aleksandr,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on thierry-reding-pwm/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on sunxi/sunxi/for-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.5-rc5 next-20230809]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aleksandr-Shubin/dt-bindings-pwm-Add-binding-for-Allwinner-D1-T113-S3-R329-PWM-controller/20230810-225849
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810145443.1053387-3-privatesub2%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230812/202308122212.SOHP09RP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230812/202308122212.SOHP09RP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308122212.SOHP09RP-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c: In function 'sun20i_pwm_apply':
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c:121:48: warning: unused variable 'tmp' [-Wunused-variable]
     121 |         u64 bus_rate, hosc_rate, clk_div, val, tmp;
         |                                                ^~~


vim +/tmp +121 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c

   115	
   116	static int sun20i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
   117				    const struct pwm_state *state)
   118	{
   119		struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
   120		u32 clk_gate, clk_cfg, pwm_en, ctl, period;
 > 121		u64 bus_rate, hosc_rate, clk_div, val, tmp;
   122		u32 prescaler, div_m;
   123		bool use_bus_clk;
   124		int ret = 0;
   125	
   126		mutex_lock(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
   127	
   128		pwm_en = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, PWM_ENABLE);
   129	
   130		if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled)
   131			clk_gate = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, PWM_CLK_GATE);
   132	
   133		if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled && !state->enabled) {
   134			clk_gate &= ~PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(pwm->hwpwm);
   135			pwm_en &= ~PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm);
   136			sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, pwm_en, PWM_ENABLE);
   137			sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_gate, PWM_CLK_GATE);
   138		}
   139	
   140		if (state->polarity != pwm->state.polarity ||
   141		    state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle ||
   142		    state->period != pwm->state.period) {
   143			ctl = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
   144			clk_cfg = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm));
   145			hosc_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc);
   146			bus_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_bus);
   147			if (pwm_en & PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm ^ 1)) {
   148				/* if the neighbor channel is enable, check period only */
   149				use_bus_clk = FIELD_GET(PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, clk_cfg) != 0;
   150				val = state->period * (use_bus_clk ? bus_rate : hosc_rate);
   151				do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
   152	
   153				div_m = FIELD_GET(PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, clk_cfg);
   154			} else {
   155				/* check period and select clock source */
   156				use_bus_clk = false;
   157				val = state->period * hosc_rate;
   158				do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
   159				if (val <= 1) {
   160					use_bus_clk = true;
   161					val = state->period * bus_rate;
   162					do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
   163					if (val <= 1) {
   164						ret = -EINVAL;
   165						goto unlock_mutex;
   166					}
   167				}
   168				div_m = fls(DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(val, PWM_MAGIC));
   169				if (div_m >= 9) {
   170					ret = -EINVAL;
   171					goto unlock_mutex;
   172				}
   173	
   174				/* set up the CLK_DIV_M and clock CLK_SRC */
   175				clk_cfg = FIELD_PREP(PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, div_m);
   176				clk_cfg |= FIELD_PREP(PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, use_bus_clk);
   177	
   178				sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_cfg, PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm));
   179			}
   180	
   181			/* calculate prescaler, PWM entire cycle */
   182			clk_div = val >> div_m;
   183			if (clk_div <= 65534) {
   184				prescaler = 0;
   185			} else {
   186				prescaler = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(clk_div - 65534, 65535);
   187				if (prescaler >= 256) {
   188					ret = -EINVAL;
   189					goto unlock_mutex;
   190				}
   191				do_div(clk_div, prescaler + 1);
   192			}
   193	
   194			period = FIELD_PREP(PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE, clk_div);
   195	
   196			/* set duty cycle */
   197			val = state->duty_cycle * (use_bus_clk ? bus_rate : hosc_rate);
   198			do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
   199			clk_div = val >> div_m;
   200			do_div(clk_div, prescaler + 1);
   201	
   202			/*
   203			 * The formula of the output period and the duty-cycle for PWM are as follows.
   204			 * T period = (PWM01_CLK / PWM0_PRESCALE_K)^-1 * (PPR0.PWM_ENTIRE_CYCLE + 1)
   205			 * T high-level = (PWM01_CLK / PWM0_PRESCALE_K)^-1 * PPR0.PWM_ACT_CYCLE
   206			 * Duty-cycle = T high-level / T period
   207			 * In accordance with this formula, in order to set the duty-cycle to 100%,
   208			 * it is necessary that PWM_ACT_CYCLE >= PWM_ENTIRE_CYCLE + 1
   209			 */
   210			if (state->duty_cycle == state->period)
   211				clk_div++;
   212			period |= FIELD_PREP(PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE, clk_div);
   213			sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, period, PWM_PERIOD(pwm->hwpwm));
   214	
   215			ctl = FIELD_PREP(PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K, prescaler);
   216			if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
   217				ctl |= PWM_CTL_ACT_STA;
   218	
   219			sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, ctl, PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
   220		}
   221	
   222		if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled && state->enabled) {
   223			clk_gate &= ~PWM_CLK_GATE_BYPASS(pwm->hwpwm);
   224			clk_gate |= PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(pwm->hwpwm);
   225			pwm_en |= PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm);
   226			sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, pwm_en, PWM_ENABLE);
   227			sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_gate, PWM_CLK_GATE);
   228		}
   229	
   230	unlock_mutex:
   231		mutex_unlock(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
   232	
   233		return ret;
   234	}
   235	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ