linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/17] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:36:57 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David.Kaplan@....com,
        Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/17] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM

On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> With the difference being that UNTRAIN_RET_VM uses
> X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT instead of X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB.
> 
> This cures VMEXIT doing potentially unret+IBPB or double IBPB.

Can't - I have a separate flag for that and I set it only when !IBPB:

        case SRSO_CMD_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT:
                if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_SRSO)) {
                        if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB) && has_microcode) {
                                setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT);


But I like the separate macro.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette