linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 25/25] kprobes: Prohibit probing on CFI preamble symbol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230813160936.1082758-25-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:09:36 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
        anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 25/25] kprobes: Prohibit probing on CFI preamble symbol

From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit de02f2ac5d8cfb311f44f2bf144cc20002f1fbbd ]

Do not allow to probe on "__cfi_" or "__pfx_" started symbol, because those
are used for CFI and not executed. Probing it will break the CFI.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/168904024679.116016.18089228029322008512.stgit@devnote2/

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 86d71c49b4957..f1ea3123f3832 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1628,6 +1628,17 @@ int __weak arch_check_ftrace_location(struct kprobe *p)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool is_cfi_preamble_symbol(unsigned long addr)
+{
+	char symbuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
+
+	if (lookup_symbol_name(addr, symbuf))
+		return false;
+
+	return str_has_prefix("__cfi_", symbuf) ||
+		str_has_prefix("__pfx_", symbuf);
+}
+
 static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
 				     struct module **probed_mod)
 {
@@ -1646,7 +1657,8 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
 	    within_kprobe_blacklist((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
 	    jump_label_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
 	    static_call_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
-	    find_bug((unsigned long)p->addr)) {
+	    find_bug((unsigned long)p->addr) ||
+	    is_cfi_preamble_symbol((unsigned long)p->addr)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
-- 
2.40.1