linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename variable pTS in function rtllib_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2023 08:55:21 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tree Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>
Cc:     philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename variable pTS in
 function rtllib_rx_ADDBAReq()

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:50:31PM -0700, Tree Davies wrote:
> Rename variable pTS in function rtllib_rx_ADDBAReq() to rx_ts
> to fix checkpatch warning Avoid CamelCase.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tree Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>
> ---
> v2:Resending in smaller patch series
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
> index 1eff30533f47..2748ab59545c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int rtllib_rx_ADDBAReq(struct rtllib_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	union ba_param_set *pBaParamSet = NULL;
>  	u16 *pBaTimeoutVal = NULL;
>  	union sequence_control *pBaStartSeqCtrl = NULL;
> -	struct rx_ts_record *pTS = NULL;
> +	struct rx_ts_record *rx_ts = NULL;

This should just be called "ts" as that's what it is being used for, as
the original name says.

I've stopped reviewing the series here, please go through and make sure
all of your renames make logical sense as that is important when reading
the code in the future.

thanks,

greg k-h