linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/nolibc: customize CROSS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230813091625.GG8237@1wt.eu>
Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:16:25 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        tanyuan@...ylab.org, thomas@...ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/nolibc: customize CROSS_COMPILE for all
 architectures

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 04:32:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> +CROSS_COMPILE_i386      ?= x86_64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_x86_64    ?= x86_64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_x86       ?= x86_64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_arm64     ?= aarch64-linux-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_arm       ?= arm-linux-gnueabi-
> +CROSS_COMPILE_mips      ?= mips64-linux-

Given that we don't support mips64, I'd suggest to ust mips-linux-
instead here for now. That doesn't seem right to ask users to
download a toolchain for a different architecture than the one
supported just because we can adapt to it.

Willy