[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64da55624c6c1_2138e294cf@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:25:06 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
"Brijesh Singh" <brijesh.singh@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] virt: sevguest: Add TSM_REPORTS support for
SNP_{GET, GET_EXT}_REPORT
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:43:38AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > +static u8 *sev_report_new(struct device *dev, const struct tsm_desc *desc,
>
> > + size_t *outblob_len)
> > +{
>
> > +
> > + u8 *buf __free(kvfree) = kvzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
>
> > +
> > + *outblob_len = size;
> > + no_free_ptr(buf);
> > + return buf;
>
> This seems broken, no_free_ptr(x) is basically xchg(X, NULL) (except no
> atomics). So the above would end up being:
>
> return NULL;
>
> What you want to write is somehting like:
>
> return no_free_ptr(buf);
>
> or, a convenient shorthand:
>
> return_ptr(buf);
>
Oh, I indeed did not realize that no_free_ptr() had side effects beyond
canceling the free when the variable goes out of scope. Will switch to
return_ptr().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists