linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230814165246.GA911700@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:52:46 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Sven Volkinsfeld <thyrc@....net>,
        Daniel Kolesa <daniel@...aforge.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:13:39PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > 1911 is still being investigated (some additional eyes on it would not
> > hurt).
> 
> I'm hoping that we can take this one:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809072200.543939260@infradead.org
> 
> which should resolve this issue, right?

Yes, it does, as least for mainline and 6.4. The backport to 6.1 seems
hairy (due to a lack of call depth tracking me thinks). It may be worth
taking Nick's change there for simplicity's sake but I'll let y'all make
that decision.

Cheers,
Nathan