[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOSviJ13RJd4gTL2dzXrijXLaPUCB-pGG6x+_8ouW=7REO6e7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 22:28:18 +0530
From: Nitesh Shetty <nitheshshetty@...il.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Vincent Fu <vincent.fu@...sung.com>,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
gost.dev@...sung.com, Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, dlemoal@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v14 04/11] block: add emulation for copy
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 4:25 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> On 8/11/23 03:52, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> > + schedule_work(&emulation_io->emulation_work);
>
> schedule_work() uses system_wq. This won't work for all users since
> there are no latency guarantees for system_wq.
>
At present copy is treated as background operation, so went ahead
with the current approach.
Thank you,
Nitesh Shetty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists