linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC v2 2/3] mm: Reorg and declare free spaces in struct folio tails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230814184411.330496-3-peterx@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:44:10 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, peterx@...hat.com,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 2/3] mm: Reorg and declare free spaces in struct folio tails

It's not 100% clear on what are the free spaces in the folio tail pages.
Currently we defined fields for only tail pages 1-2 but they're not really
fully occupied.  Add the fields to show what is free, and also reorg them a
bit to make 32/64 bits alignment easy.

Here _free_1_0 should be a constant hole (of 2 bytes) on any system, make
them explicit so people know they can be reused at any time.

_free_1_1 is special and need some attention: this will shift tail page 1's
fields starting from _entire_mapcount to be 4 bytes later.  I don't expect
this change much on real performance - if it will it might be good to have
_entire_mapcount and _nr_pages_mapped to be put on the same 8B alignment,
assuming that _pincount should be rarer to be used in real life.  But in
all cases the movement shouldn't change much on x86 or anything that has
64B cachelines.  This is the major reason why I had this change separate
from the upcoming documentation update patch - it may need some attention,
and when unwanted things happen (I don't expect) we quickly know what's
wrong.

_free_1_2 / _free_2_1 just calls out extra free spaces elsewhere and
shouldn't affect a thing just like _free_1_0.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 3f2b0d46f5d6..829f5adfded1 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -329,11 +329,21 @@ struct folio {
 	/* public: */
 			unsigned char _folio_dtor;
 			unsigned char _folio_order;
+	/* private: 2 bytes can be reused later */
+			unsigned char _free_1_0[2];
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+	/* 4 bytes can be reused later (64 bits only) */
+			unsigned char _free_1_1[4];
+#endif
+	/* public: */
 			atomic_t _entire_mapcount;
 			atomic_t _nr_pages_mapped;
 			atomic_t _pincount;
 #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 			unsigned int _folio_nr_pages;
+	/* private: 4 bytes can be reused later (64 bits only) */
+			unsigned char _free_1_2[4];
+	/* public: */
 #endif
 	/* private: the union with struct page is transitional */
 		};
@@ -355,6 +365,8 @@ struct folio {
 			unsigned long _head_2a;
 	/* public: */
 			struct list_head _deferred_list;
+	/* private: 8 more free bytes for either 32/64 bits */
+			unsigned char _free_2_1[8];
 	/* private: the union with struct page is transitional */
 		};
 		struct page __page_2;
-- 
2.41.0