linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu: Consolidate pasid dma ownership check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230814011759.102089-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:17:58 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc:     Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu: Consolidate pasid dma ownership check

When switching device DMA ownership, it is required that all the device's
pasid DMA be disabled. This is done by checking if the pasid array of the
group is empty. Consolidate all the open code into a single helper. No
intentional functionality change.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index f1eba60e573f..d4a06a37ce39 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -3127,6 +3127,19 @@ static bool iommu_is_default_domain(struct iommu_group *group)
 	return false;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Assert no PASID DMA when claiming or releasing group's DMA ownership.
+ * The device pasid interfaces are only for device drivers that have
+ * claimed the DMA ownership. Return true if no pasid DMA setup, otherwise
+ * return false with a WARN().
+ */
+static bool assert_pasid_dma_ownership(struct iommu_group *group)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
+
+	return !WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&group->pasid_array));
+}
+
 /**
  * iommu_device_use_default_domain() - Device driver wants to handle device
  *                                     DMA through the kernel DMA API.
@@ -3147,7 +3160,7 @@ int iommu_device_use_default_domain(struct device *dev)
 	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
 	if (group->owner_cnt) {
 		if (group->owner || !iommu_is_default_domain(group) ||
-		    !xa_empty(&group->pasid_array)) {
+		    !assert_pasid_dma_ownership(group)) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
 			goto unlock_out;
 		}
@@ -3177,7 +3190,7 @@ void iommu_device_unuse_default_domain(struct device *dev)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
-	if (!WARN_ON(!group->owner_cnt || !xa_empty(&group->pasid_array)))
+	if (!WARN_ON(!group->owner_cnt) && assert_pasid_dma_ownership(group))
 		group->owner_cnt--;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
@@ -3211,7 +3224,7 @@ static int __iommu_take_dma_ownership(struct iommu_group *group, void *owner)
 	int ret;
 
 	if ((group->domain && group->domain != group->default_domain) ||
-	    !xa_empty(&group->pasid_array))
+	    !assert_pasid_dma_ownership(group))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	ret = __iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain(group);
@@ -3296,8 +3309,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_device_claim_dma_owner);
 
 static void __iommu_release_dma_ownership(struct iommu_group *group)
 {
-	if (WARN_ON(!group->owner_cnt || !group->owner ||
-		    !xa_empty(&group->pasid_array)))
+	if (WARN_ON(!group->owner_cnt || !group->owner) ||
+	    !assert_pasid_dma_ownership(group))
 		return;
 
 	group->owner_cnt = 0;
-- 
2.34.1