lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64dab7a322eef_2138e29421@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:24:19 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] virt: sevguest: Prep for kernel internal {get,
 get_ext}_report()

Dionna Amalie Glaze wrote:
> >
> >         switch (ioctl) {
> >         case SNP_GET_REPORT:
> > -               ret = get_report(snp_dev, &input);
> > +               ret = get_report(snp_dev, &input, SNP_UARG);
> >                 break;
> >         case SNP_GET_DERIVED_KEY:
> >                 ret = get_derived_key(snp_dev, &input);
> >                 break;
> 
> Do we have an agreement around the continued existence of sev-guest
> for supporting derived keys, is that similarly slated for the chopping
> block, or is it left undecided?
> It appears your choice to not include the uarg/karg extension here is
> deliberate.

I do want to understand the argument from James a bit more, but the
exlcusion here was simply because there is currently no support for this
concept from other vendors.

That said, if it remains a vendor unique concept and continues getting
suspicious looks from folks like James, it may indeed be something the
kernel wants to jettison.

> >         case SNP_GET_EXT_REPORT:
> > -               ret = get_ext_report(snp_dev, &input);
> > +               ret = get_ext_report(snp_dev, &input, SNP_UARG);
> >                 break;
> >         default:
> >                 break;
> >
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>

Thanks for all your help on this!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ