linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kunit: replace KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB maro with KUNIT_STATIC_STUB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <915f6336-fc33-c87e-01ac-a80550abbf61@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:44:28 +0800
From:   Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     brendan.higgins@...ux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: replace KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB maro with
 KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT



on 8/12/2023 3:48 PM, David Gow wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 17:20, Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> We mix up KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB and KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT in
>> static_stub header. Just correct KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB to
>> KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT which is documented.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
>> ---
> 
> Thanks for catching this!
> 
> Only minor note is that there's a typo in the subject ("maro","macro").
> 
> Fixes: e047c5eaa763 ("kunit: Expose 'static stub' API to redirect functions")
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Thanks for the feedback, I will fix it in next version.
> Cheers,
> -- David
> 
>>  include/kunit/static_stub.h | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/kunit/static_stub.h b/include/kunit/static_stub.h
>> index 9b80150a5d62..85315c80b303 100644
>> --- a/include/kunit/static_stub.h
>> +++ b/include/kunit/static_stub.h
>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>>  #if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
>>
>>  /* If CONFIG_KUNIT is not enabled, these stubs quietly disappear. */
>> -#define KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB(real_fn_name, args...) do {} while (0)
>> +#define KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT(real_fn_name, args...) do {} while (0)
>>
>>  #else
>>
>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>>   * This is a function prologue which is used to allow calls to the current
>>   * function to be redirected by a KUnit test. KUnit tests can call
>>   * kunit_activate_static_stub() to pass a replacement function in. The
>> - * replacement function will be called by KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB(), which
>> + * replacement function will be called by KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT(), which
>>   * will then return from the function. If the caller is not in a KUnit context,
>>   * the function will continue execution as normal.
>>   *
>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void __kunit_activate_static_stub(struct kunit *test,
>>   * When activated, calls to real_fn_addr from within this test (even if called
>>   * indirectly) will instead call replacement_addr. The function pointed to by
>>   * real_fn_addr must begin with the static stub prologue in
>> - * KUNIT_TRIGGER_STATIC_STUB() for this to work. real_fn_addr and
>> + * KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT() for this to work. real_fn_addr and
>>   * replacement_addr must have the same type.
>>   *
>>   * The redirection can be disabled again with kunit_deactivate_static_stub().
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20230725172051.2142641-1-shikemeng%40huaweicloud.com.