linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Tx queues with coe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9f69629b-b341-44d0-de31-f8ac3f22fa6b@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:30:56 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Tx queues with
 coe

On 10/08/2023 17:03, Rohan G Thomas wrote:
> Add dt-bindings for the number of tx queues with coe support. Some
> dwmac IPs support tx queues only for few initial tx queues, starting
> from tx queue 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested by
automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be a waste
of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow the
process allowing the patch to be tested.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Best regards,
Krzysztof